Wilson v. Carlinville National Bank

87 Ill. App. 364, 1899 Ill. App. LEXIS 383
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedFebruary 27, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 87 Ill. App. 364 (Wilson v. Carlinville National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Carlinville National Bank, 87 Ill. App. 364, 1899 Ill. App. LEXIS 383 (Ill. Ct. App. 1900).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Wright

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case was before us at a former time and is reported as Carlinville National Bank v. Wilson, 78 Ill. App. 339. Por reasons stated in the opinion at that time the judgment of the Circuit Court was reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. A new trial was had, in which a jury was waived, and resulted in a finding and judgment against appellant for §339, to reverse which he prosecutes this, appeal. The facts established by the evidence upon the second trial are -substantially the same- that appeared upon the first trial. Under the provision of the Appellate Court act the previous opinion filed in this cause is of binding authority herein, and however much disposed we might be to reconsider the reasons of the court for its decision expressed in that opinion, we have no right to do so. Such a practice would produce judicial chaos. That opinion and the reasons and the judgment of the court, expressed upon the same facts in the same case before us, are binding upon the parties herein and upon the court. It would be as much impertinence for us, as it would have been for the trial court, to disregard our former opinion. The case has been disposed of by the trial court in confonnity with the law as we have previously stated it, and independently of the binding authority of the former opinion, we are well satisfied with our views as therein expressed, and reaffirm the doctrine contained therein.

The judgment of the Circuit Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gillum v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.
250 Ill. App. 617 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1928)
Anderson v. Fletcher
228 Ill. App. 372 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1923)
Tisdale v. Davis
198 Ill. App. 116 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1916)
Boyle Ice Co. v. California Ice Co.
194 Ill. App. 475 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1915)
Conner v. Conner
163 Ill. App. 436 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1911)
Delta Bag Co. v. Kearns
160 Ill. App. 93 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1911)
Davis v. Munie
140 Ill. App. 171 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1908)
Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Danforth
137 Ill. App. 338 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1907)
Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Alfred
123 Ill. App. 477 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1905)
Fry v. Radzinski
121 Ill. App. 303 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1905)
Murphy v. Murphy
93 Ill. App. 671 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1901)
United States Express Co. v. Burke
94 Ill. App. 29 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 Ill. App. 364, 1899 Ill. App. LEXIS 383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-carlinville-national-bank-illappct-1900.