Wilson v. Brumfield

8 Blackf. 146, 1846 Ind. LEXIS 81
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1846
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 8 Blackf. 146 (Wilson v. Brumfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Brumfield, 8 Blackf. 146, 1846 Ind. LEXIS 81 (Ind. 1846).

Opinion

A PURCPIASER of real estate cannot be compelled to take only a part of the land for which he has contracted. If he cannot get the whole, he has a right to rescind the contract; but he has also a right, generally, to insist that the vendor shall perform the contract so far as he is able, and make compensation in damages for the breach of that part of it which he cannot perform. 2 Story’s Eq., sect. 779. — Paton v. Rogers, 1 Ves. & B. 351. — Todd v. Gee, 17 Ves. 273.— Waters v. Travis, 9 Johns. 450. — 1 Sugd. Vend- 319.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aiple-Hemmelmann Real Estate Co. v. Spelbrink
111 S.W. 480 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1908)
Puterbaugh v. Puterbaugh
33 N.E. 808 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1893)
Martin v. Merritt
57 Ind. 34 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Blackf. 146, 1846 Ind. LEXIS 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-brumfield-ind-1846.