Wilson v. Bridges
617 N.W.2d 325, 463 Mich. 890
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 10, 2000
Docket116645, COA No. 207735
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 617 N.W.2d 325 (Wilson v. Bridges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wilson v. Bridges, 617 N.W.2d 325, 463 Mich. 890 (Mich. 2000).
Opinion
Alphonso C. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Jim H. BRIDGES, Jr. and Chrysler Transport, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the March 17, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Murphy v. Secretary of State
617 N.W.2d 325 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
617 N.W.2d 325, 463 Mich. 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-bridges-mich-2000.