Wilson v. Bridges
617 N.W.2d 325, 463 Mich. 890
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 10, 2000·No. 116645, COA No. 207735·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Alphonso C. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Jim H. BRIDGES, Jr. and Chrysler Transport, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the March 17, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilson v. Bridges, 617 N.W.2d 325, 463 Mich. 890 (Mich. 2000).
617 N.W.2d 325 (Wilson v. Bridges) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Murphy v. Secretary of State
617 N.W.2d 325 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2000)