Wilson v. Brazzeal

9 S.E.2d 717, 62 Ga. App. 693, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 405
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 14, 1940·No. 28155.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

An approved brief of evidence is indispensable to the consideration of a motion for new trial. When a motion for new trial was assigned for hearing, and no one representing the movant appeared at such hearing, and no brief of evidence was filed or approved with the motion, it was not error for the court to dismiss the motion.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Maolntyre, J., conowr. Gardner, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Brazzeal, 9 S.E.2d 717, 62 Ga. App. 693, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 405 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940).

9 S.E.2d 717 (Wilson v. Brazzeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grant v. State Highway Department
126 S.E.2d 243 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Powell v. Powell
21 S.E.2d 247 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)