Wilson v. Brazzeal
9 S.E.2d 717, 62 Ga. App. 693, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 405
This text of 9 S.E.2d 717 (Wilson v. Brazzeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wilson v. Brazzeal, 9 S.E.2d 717, 62 Ga. App. 693, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 405 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940).
Opinion
An approved brief of evidence is indispensable to the consideration of a motion for new trial. When a motion for new trial was assigned for hearing, and no one representing the movant appeared at such hearing, and no brief of evidence was filed or approved with the motion, it was not error for the court to dismiss the motion.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Grant v. State Highway Department
126 S.E.2d 243 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Powell v. Powell
21 S.E.2d 247 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
9 S.E.2d 717, 62 Ga. App. 693, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-brazzeal-gactapp-1940.