Wilson v. Bray

630 S.E.2d 395, 280 Ga. 594, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 1565, 2006 Ga. LEXIS 358
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 17, 2006
DocketS06A0515
StatusPublished

This text of 630 S.E.2d 395 (Wilson v. Bray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Bray, 630 S.E.2d 395, 280 Ga. 594, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 1565, 2006 Ga. LEXIS 358 (Ga. 2006).

Opinions

HUNSTEIN, Presiding Justice.

This case is controlled by our opinion in Wilson v. Windsor, 280 Ga. 576 (630 SE2d 367) (2006). The record establishes that appellee Bray, like the probationer in Wilson v. Windsor, did not meet the criteria for confinement in a probation detention center under OCGA § 42-8-35.41 and thus his confinement in such a facility was unauthorized. Wilson v. Windsor, supra. Accordingly, we affirm the habeas corpus court and remand for imposition of a new sentence. Id.

Judgment affirmed and case remanded with direction.

All the Justices concur, except Carley, Hines and Melton, JJ., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. Windsor
630 S.E.2d 367 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
630 S.E.2d 395, 280 Ga. 594, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 1565, 2006 Ga. LEXIS 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-bray-ga-2006.