Wilson v. Bray
This text of 630 S.E.2d 395 (Wilson v. Bray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This case is controlled by our opinion in Wilson v. Windsor, 280 Ga. 576 (630 SE2d 367) (2006). The record establishes that appellee Bray, like the probationer in Wilson v. Windsor, did not meet the criteria for confinement in a probation detention center under OCGA § 42-8-35.41 and thus his confinement in such a facility was unauthorized. Wilson v. Windsor, supra. Accordingly, we affirm the habeas corpus court and remand for imposition of a new sentence. Id.
Judgment affirmed and case remanded with direction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
630 S.E.2d 395, 280 Ga. 594, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 1565, 2006 Ga. LEXIS 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-bray-ga-2006.