Wilson v. Bray

630 S.E.2d 395, 280 Ga. 594, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 1565, 2006 Ga. LEXIS 358
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 17, 2006·No. S06A0515·Published

Opinions

HUNSTEIN, Presiding Justice.

This case is controlled by our opinion in Wilson v. Windsor, 280 Ga. 576 (630 SE2d 367) (2006). The record establishes that appellee Bray, like the probationer in Wilson v. Windsor, did not meet the criteria for confinement in a probation detention center under OCGA § 42-8-35.41 and thus his confinement in such a facility was unauthorized. Wilson v. Windsor, supra. Accordingly, we affirm the habeas corpus court and remand for imposition of a new sentence. Id.

Judgment affirmed and case remanded with direction.

All the Justices concur, except Carley, Hines and Melton, JJ., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Bray, 630 S.E.2d 395, 280 Ga. 594, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 1565, 2006 Ga. LEXIS 358 (Ga. 2006).

630 S.E.2d 395 (Wilson v. Bray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. Windsor
630 S.E.2d 367 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2006)