Wilson v. Bowman
21 N.E.3d 562, 24 N.Y.3d 1000, 997 N.Y.S.2d 110, 2014 NY Slip Op 88442, 2014 N.Y. LEXIS 3163
This text of 21 N.E.3d 562 (Wilson v. Bowman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wilson v. Bowman, 21 N.E.3d 562, 24 N.Y.3d 1000, 997 N.Y.S.2d 110, 2014 NY Slip Op 88442, 2014 N.Y. LEXIS 3163 (N.Y. 2014).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298 [1929]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.
169 N.E. 386 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
21 N.E.3d 562, 24 N.Y.3d 1000, 997 N.Y.S.2d 110, 2014 NY Slip Op 88442, 2014 N.Y. LEXIS 3163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-bowman-ny-2014.