Wilson v. Board of Supervisors

3 Cal. 386
California Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1853·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Heydenfeldt, Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court. Wells, Justice, concurred.

The writ of certiorari was sued out prematurely.

If it is true, as insisted by the appellant, that the Board of Supervisors had no jurisdiction over the subject, the objection should first have been taken before the board. This course might have saved the necessity of an appeal; without the action of the board, it is impossible to say whether it would have decided to take, or decline jurisdiction, and until it shall do one or the other, there can be no cause of complaint.

The certiorari was properly dismissed, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Board of Supervisors, 3 Cal. 386 (Cal. 1853).

3 Cal. 386 (Wilson v. Board of Supervisors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holabird v. Railroad Commission
154 P. 831 (California Supreme Court, 1916)
Gauld v. Board of Supervisors of San Francisco
54 P. 272 (California Supreme Court, 1898)
Sayers v. Superior Court of San Francisco
24 P. 296 (California Supreme Court, 1890)
Territory ex rel. Gray v. District Court
30 N.W. 145 (Supreme Court of Dakota, 1886)
People ex rel. San Francisco v. County Judge
40 Cal. 479 (California Supreme Court, 1871)