Wilson v. Blair
This text of 7 N.W. 504 (Wilson v. Blair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Ho errors are assigned, and it is objected by the appellee that the abstract does not purport to contain all the evidence.
We are constrained to say the objection is well taken. The trial judge certified the transcript contained all the evidence, but it is not before us and the abstract fails to state all the evidence is contained therein, and in fact it shows affirmatively that certain exhibits which were introduced in evidence have been omitted therefrom. We cannot, therefore, reverse or modify the decree below. Overholt et al. v. Esmay et al., 54 Iowa, 748.
Aeeirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 N.W. 504, 55 Iowa 745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-blair-iowa-1880.