Wilson v. Black

104 Mass. 406
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 15, 1870·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Wells, J

His grantor having possession, the demandant took sufficient title, under bis deed, to enable him to maintain a writ of entry. But the tenant held a prior title by an absolute deed. The unsealed written agreement to reconvey did not constitute a defeasance at law. Performance of the condition of that agreement would not operate to revest the legal title in the grantor. It requires a reconveyance, and that can be enforced only in equity. Until the legal title is restored to the grantor or his assigns, the deed to the tenant gives him the better title, which must prevail at law. Cranston v. Crane, 97 Mass. 459. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Black, 104 Mass. 406 (Mass. 1870).

104 Mass. 406 (Wilson v. Black) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carlisle v. Libby
70 N.E. 423 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1904)