Wilson v. Black

90 S.E. 225, 18 Ga. App. 650, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1166
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 4, 1916
Docket7355
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 90 S.E. 225 (Wilson v. Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Black, 90 S.E. 225, 18 Ga. App. 650, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1166 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Broyles, J.

This is a direct bill of exceptions to certain rulings made during the progress of the trial, and to portions of the charge of the court. It appearing that the case proceeded to a verdict, and that the plaintiff in error made also a motion for a new trial, which motion was still pending and undisposed of in - the court below when this bill of exceptions was sued out, the bill of exceptions was prematurely brought, and the writ of error must be dismissed. There being no apparent merit in the bill of exceptions, the request of counsel for the plaintiff in error that he be allowed to Withdraw the same, and to file it as exceptions pendente lite, is denied. Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grahl v. Dorsey
193 S.E. 590 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 S.E. 225, 18 Ga. App. 650, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-black-gactapp-1916.