Wilson v. Belleque

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Wilson v. Belleque

114 P.3d 544, 200 Or. App. 554, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 807

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJuly 6, 2005

Docket04C-14869; A125664

StatusPublished

This text of 114 P.3d 544 (Wilson v. Belleque) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson v. Belleque, 114 P.3d 544, 200 Or. App. 554, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 807 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff appeals a judgment that dismissed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. In the petition, plaintiff challenged his continued incarceration in prison and an alleged failure to provide necessary medical care to address the presence of a sewing needle that is lodged inside plaintiffs body. We affirm without discussion the dismissal of the petition as it relates to plaintiffs challenge to his continued incarceration. As to the dismissal that relates to the alleged failure to provide necessary medical care, defendant concedes that the court erred in dismissing the petition on that claim. We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s concession.

Dismissal of petition for writ of habeas corpus on claim of inadequate medical treatment reversed and remanded; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff appeals a judgment that dismissed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. In the petition, plaintiff challenged his continued incarceration in prison and an alleged failure to provide necessary medical care to address the presence of a sewing needle that is lodged inside plaintiffs body. We affirm without discussion the dismissal of the petition as it relates to plaintiffs challenge to his continued incarceration. As to the dismissal that relates to the alleged failure to provide necessary medical care, defendant concedes that the court erred in dismissing the petition on that claim. We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s concession.

Dismissal of petition for writ of habeas corpus on claim of inadequate medical treatment reversed and remanded; otherwise affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 P.3d 544, 200 Or. App. 554, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-belleque-orctapp-2005.