Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/Wilson v. Bellamy

Wilson v. Bellamy

418 S.E.2d 668, 331 N.C. 558
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 24, 1992
DocketNo. 141P92
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 418 S.E.2d 668 (Wilson v. Bellamy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Bellamy, 418 S.E.2d 668, 331 N.C. 558 (N.C. 1992).

Opinion

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 24 June 1992. Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 24 June 1992.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith-Price v. Charter Behavioral Health Systems
595 S.E.2d 778 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
Guthrie v. Conroy
567 S.E.2d 403 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)
Markham v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance
481 S.E.2d 349 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1997)
Hyde v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
473 S.E.2d 680 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1996)
Picklesimer v. Cox
79 F.3d 1141 (Fourth Circuit, 1996)
Poston v. Poston
436 S.E.2d 854 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1993)
Horne v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
4 F.3d 276 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)
prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 13,625 Linda P. Horne, of the Estate of Benny Gerald Horne, and Benny Gerald Horne v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and Ac & S, Incorporated, a Pennsylvania Corporation Amchem Products, Incorporated the Celotex Corporation, Individually and as Successor Manufacturing Company, Philip Carey Corporation, Panacon Corporation, Glen Alden Corporation, Rapid American Corporation, Briggs Manufacturing Company, and Smith and Kanzler, a Delaware Corporation C.E. Thurston & Sons, a Virginia Corporation Combustion Engineering, Incorporated Crown Cork & Seal Company, Incorporated, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Mundet Cork Corporation, a New York Corporation Eagle-Picher Industries, Incorporated, an Ohio Corporation Flintkote Company, a Massachusetts Corporation Fireboard Corporation, Pabco Industrial Products Division, a Delawarecorporation Gaf Corporation, a Delaware Corporation W.R. Grace & Company, a Connecticut Corporation A.P. Greene Refractories Company Keene Corporation, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Keene Building Products Corporation, Keene Insulation Products Corporation, Ehret-Magnesia Manufacturing Company, Baldwin-Ehret-Hill, Incorporated, Baldwin-Hill Company, and Mundet Cork Corporation, a New York Corporation National Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation Owens-Illinois, Incorporated, an Ohio Corporation Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (Unarco), a Pennsylvania Corporation H.K. Porter Company, Incorporated, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Southern Asbestos, Carolina Asbestos, Thermoid and Tullman-Mccluskey, a Delaware Corporation Raymark Industries, Incorporated, Successor in Interest to Raybestos-Manhattan, Incorporated Rock Wool Manufacturing Company, Incorporated, an Alabama Corporation Turner & Newall, P.L.C., Individually and as Alter Ego of Keasby & Mattison United States Gypsum Company, Inc. Armstrong World Industries, Incorporated, Formerly Known as Armstrong Cork Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation, General Refractories/grefco, Incorporated, U.S. Refractories Division, and Third Party v. Manville Corporation Asbestos Disease Compensation Fund, Third Party
4 F.3d 276 (Third Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
418 S.E.2d 668, 331 N.C. 558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-bellamy-nc-1992.