Wilson v. Barnum

30 F. Cas. 100, 1 Wall. Jr. 342, 1849 U.S. App. LEXIS 467

This text of 30 F. Cas. 100 (Wilson v. Barnum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Barnum, 30 F. Cas. 100, 1 Wall. Jr. 342, 1849 U.S. App. LEXIS 467 (circtedpa 1849).

Opinion

GRIER, Circuit Justice.

The old fashioned and cumbrous machinery by which these issues of fact have been hitherto managed is entirely useless; and the matter to be tried is only involved by it in a mass of words signifying nothing. Now, especially, since wagers of all sorts, have been discountenanced as illegal by the supreme court of Pennsylvania (Bdgéll v. M’Laughlin, 6 Whart. 176), there is no propriety in the old form; and it may as well be swept away at once, as the relick of a barbarous age. In the present issue, and in all future ones in this court, the matter can be put on the trial list at once, and the jury be sworn to try in the form and in the words set forth in the order of issue. There is no necessity of a declaration or pleading of any sort

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edgell v. M'Laughlin
6 Whart. 176 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1841)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 F. Cas. 100, 1 Wall. Jr. 342, 1849 U.S. App. LEXIS 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-barnum-circtedpa-1849.