Wilson v. Bank of Camden
This text of 185 S.E. 617 (Wilson v. Bank of Camden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This suit by John Wilson, as Receiver of Northwestern Railroad of South Carolina, as plaintiff, against the defendants, the Bank of Camden and D. A. Boykin, as conservator of the Bank of Camden, commenced in the Court of Common Pleas for Kershaw County, is a suit for the purpose of recovering judgment against the defendants in the sum of $1,000.00, together with interest thereon from March 4, 1933. The defendants denied liability. Issues being joined, *364 the case was tried in said Court before his Honor, Judge G. Duncan Bellinger, who rendered judgment for the plaintiff, from which judgment the defendants duly appealed to this Court.
The nature of the suit and the facts involved are fully set forth in the decree rendered by his Honor, Judge Bellinger, and for the reasons stated in his Honor’s decree we think the judgment should be affirmed.
It is, therefore, the judgment of this Court that the exceptions be and are hereby overruled and the judgment of the lower Court affirmed.
• Note: The order of his Honor, Judge G. Duncan Bellinger, will be incorporated in the report of the case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 S.E. 617, 180 S.C. 359, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-bank-of-camden-sc-1936.