Wilson v. Bachman

10 A.3d 897

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 24, 2010·No. 84 EM 2010·Published

Opinion

10 A.3d 897 (2010)

Anne WILSON, Petitioner
v.
Honorable Patricia M. BACHMAN, Workers' Compensation Judge in the Captioned Matter and Honeywell, Inc. (Formerly Allied Signal Inc.), and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, Respondents.

No. 84 EM 2010.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

September 24, 2010.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of September, 2010, the Petition for Extraordinary Relief is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

10 A.3d 897 (2010)

Anne WILSON, Petitioner
v.
Honorable Patricia M. BACHMAN, Workers' Compensation Judge in the Captioned Matter and Honeywell, Inc. (Formerly Allied Signal Inc.), and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, Respondents.

No. 84 EM 2010.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

September 24, 2010.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of September, 2010, the Petition for Extraordinary Relief is DENIED.

Wilson v. Bachman, 10 A.3d 897 (Pa. 2010).

Pincite

10 A.3d 897 (Wilson v. Bachman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.