Wilson v. Armstrong
This text of 42 Ala. 168 (Wilson v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
A. J. WALKER, C. J.
No valid ground for the order of sale, under which the property was sold by the appellant as administrator, is alleged in the application for sale. No ground or reason whatever for the sale is stated by the probate court in its order. — Revised Code, § 2067, (1743 j) Ikelheimer v. Chapman, 32 Ala. 676 ; Wyatt v. Rambo, 29 Ala. 510; Hall v. Chapman, 35 Ala. 553.
The fact that the decedent’s will directed a sale of the property was certainly no ground for an order of sale by the probate court. — Eevised Code, §§ 2067, (1743,) 206 8 (1744;) Annual Alabama Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church v. Price, MS.; McCollum v. McCollum, 33 Ala. Rep. 711.
The order of sale was void, and the plaintiff can not recover the purchase money. We regret that such is the law, yet it has been long so settled in this State. We can only say, as this court has said before, that the corrective is with the legislature. — Beene v. Collenberger, 38 Ala. 647.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 Ala. 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-armstrong-ala-1868.