Wilson v. Ansonia Brass & Copper Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Wilson v. Ansonia Brass & Copper Co.

48 F. 681, 1891 U.S. App. LEXIS 1638

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedDecember 28, 1891

StatusPublished

This text of 48 F. 681 (Wilson v. Ansonia Brass & Copper Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson v. Ansonia Brass & Copper Co., 48 F. 681, 1891 U.S. App. LEXIS 1638 (circtsdny 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Wiieelkb, J.

This suit is brought upon letters patent No. 816,422, dated April 21, 1885, and granted to the orator for an improvement in lamp-burners. The patented improvement consists principally in a wick-carrier, with inwardly projecting teeth at the top and bottom ends for holding the wick and giving it a positive movement as desired, and slots in the sides for admitting air to the interior, for an argand burner. The defenses are want of novelty and non-infringement. The proofs show styles of burners, some having one thing, and others another, similar to the plaintiff’s, but none having a wick-carrier holding the wick lirmly at each end for moving it up and down evenly all round, to properly adjust the flame, and also admitting air to the interior, as his does. The difference between his and all others is small, but it seems to be essential and useful, and therefore patentable. The defendant’s burner has a wick-carrier like the plaintiff’s in all respects, except that the wick is held by stitches at the lower end instead of by teeth. The stitches appear to be an equivalent there of the teeth, and the carrier appears to be an infringement. Let a decree be entered for the orator.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wiieelkb, J.

This suit is brought upon letters patent No. 816,422, dated April 21, 1885, and granted to the orator for an improvement in lamp-burners. The patented improvement consists principally in a wick-carrier, with inwardly projecting teeth at the top and bottom ends for holding the wick and giving it a positive movement as desired, and slots in the sides for admitting air to the interior, for an argand burner. The defenses are want of novelty and non-infringement. The proofs show styles of burners, some having one thing, and others another, similar to the plaintiff’s, but none having a wick-carrier holding the wick lirmly at each end for moving it up and down evenly all round, to properly adjust the flame, and also admitting air to the interior, as his does. The difference between his and all others is small, but it seems to be essential and useful, and therefore patentable. The defendant’s burner has a wick-carrier like the plaintiff’s in all respects, except that the wick is held by stitches at the lower end instead of by teeth. The stitches appear to be an equivalent there of the teeth, and the carrier appears to be an infringement. Let a decree be entered for the orator.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 F. 681, 1891 U.S. App. LEXIS 1638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-ansonia-brass-copper-co-circtsdny-1891.