Wilson v. Alpaugh

52 N.J. Eq. 589
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 15, 1894·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Gaeeison, Magie, Eeed, Van Syckel, Bogeet, Beown, Keuegee, Sims — 10.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Alpaugh, 52 N.J. Eq. 589 (N.J. 1894).

52 N.J. Eq. 589 (Wilson v. Alpaugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Notaro v. Notaro
118 A.2d 880 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Ward v. McLellan
173 A. 589 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1934)
Banfield v. Schulderman
3 P.2d 116 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1931)