Wilson v. Alpaugh
52 N.J. Eq. 589
Opinion
Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Gaeeison, Magie, Eeed, Van Syckel, Bogeet, Beown, Keuegee, Sims — 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilson v. Alpaugh, 52 N.J. Eq. 589 (N.J. 1894).
52 N.J. Eq. 589 (Wilson v. Alpaugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Notaro v. Notaro
118 A.2d 880 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Ward v. McLellan
173 A. 589 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1934)
Banfield v. Schulderman
3 P.2d 116 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1931)