Wilson v. AE Outfitters Retail Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wilson v. AE Outfitters Retail Co.

367 S.W.3d 680, 2012 WL 2107967, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 794

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 12, 2012·No. No. ED 97402·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lindell Wilson appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) denying him unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission’s decision is supported by sufficient competent and substantial evidence. Berwin v. Lindenwood Female College, 205 S.W.3d 291, 294 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lindell Wilson appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) denying him unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission’s decision is supported by sufficient competent and substantial evidence. Berwin v. Lindenwood Female College, 205 S.W.3d 291, 294 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Wilson v. AE Outfitters Retail Co., 367 S.W.3d 680, 2012 WL 2107967, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 794 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

367 S.W.3d 680 (Wilson v. AE Outfitters Retail Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related