Wilson v. AC&S, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Wilson v. AC&S, Inc.

861 N.E.2d 544, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1475

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 9, 2007·No. 2007-0178·Published

Opinion

Butler App. No. CA2006-03-056, 2006-0hio-6704. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. On January 31, 2007, appellants filed a notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction and listed William N. Riley and Christopher A. Moeller as co-counsel. Mr. Riley and Mr. Moeller are not admitted to practice law in Ohio and have not sought admission pro hac vice as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. 1(1) and (2). Accordingly,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the names of William N. Riley and Christopher A. Moeller are stricken from this case.

It is further ordered that Mr. Riley and Mr. Moeller shall not be permitted to participate in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler App. No. CA2006-03-056, 2006-0hio-6704. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. On January 31, 2007, appellants filed a notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction and listed William N. Riley and Christopher A. Moeller as co-counsel. Mr. Riley and Mr. Moeller are not admitted to practice law in Ohio and have not sought admission pro hac vice as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. 1(1) and (2). Accordingly,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the names of William N. Riley and Christopher A. Moeller are stricken from this case.

It is further ordered that Mr. Riley and Mr. Moeller shall not be permitted to participate in this case.

Wilson v. AC&S, Inc., 861 N.E.2d 544, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1475 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

861 N.E.2d 544 (Wilson v. AC&S, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.