Wilson v. AC&S, Inc.

861 N.E.2d 544, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1475
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 9, 2007
Docket2007-0178
StatusPublished

This text of 861 N.E.2d 544 (Wilson v. AC&S, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. AC&S, Inc., 861 N.E.2d 544, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1475 (Ohio 2007).

Opinion

Butler App. No. CA2006-03-056, 2006-0hio-6704. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. On January 31, 2007, appellants filed a notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction and listed William N. Riley and Christopher A. Moeller as co-counsel. Mr. Riley and Mr. Moeller are not admitted to practice law in Ohio and have not sought admission pro hac vice as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. 1(1) and (2). Accordingly,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the names of William N. Riley and Christopher A. Moeller are stricken from this case.

It is further ordered that Mr. Riley and Mr. Moeller shall not be permitted to participate in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
861 N.E.2d 544, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-acs-inc-ohio-2007.