Wilson Transit Co. v. Fairchild Milling Co.
89 F.2d 1023, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3741
This text of 89 F.2d 1023 (Wilson Transit Co. v. Fairchild Milling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wilson Transit Co. v. Fairchild Milling Co., 89 F.2d 1023, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3741 (6th Cir. 1937).
Opinion
The court being of opinion that there was substantial evidence on which to submit this cause to the jury, and that no error prejudicial to the appellant was committed by the trial court in its charge to-the jury or in refusing to charge the jury as requested by appellant, it is ordered that the judgment be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
89 F.2d 1023, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-transit-co-v-fairchild-milling-co-ca6-1937.