Wilson & Tavridges, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Wilson & Tavridges, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

205 N.E.2d 446, 32 Ill. 2d 355, 1965 Ill. LEXIS 343

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 18, 1965

DocketNo. 38819

StatusPublished

This text of 205 N.E.2d 446 (Wilson & Tavridges, Inc. v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson & Tavridges, Inc. v. Industrial Commission, 205 N.E.2d 446, 32 Ill. 2d 355, 1965 Ill. LEXIS 343 (Ill. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Klingbiel

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiffs seek review of a judgment of the circuit court of Winnebago County which affirmed an order of the Industrial Commission finding, as an arbitrator had found, that the defendant David W. Payne, was entitled to certain benefits payable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The sole issue raised is whether various findings by the Commission are against the manifest weight of the evidence and upon examination of the record we see neither reason to disturb the judgment below nor substantial questions which require or justify an extended opinion.

The judgment of the circuit court of Winnebago County is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Klingbiel

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiffs seek review of a judgment of the circuit court of Winnebago County which affirmed an order of the Industrial Commission finding, as an arbitrator had found, that the defendant David W. Payne, was entitled to certain benefits payable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The sole issue raised is whether various findings by the Commission are against the manifest weight of the evidence and upon examination of the record we see neither reason to disturb the judgment below nor substantial questions which require or justify an extended opinion.

The judgment of the circuit court of Winnebago County is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 N.E.2d 446, 32 Ill. 2d 355, 1965 Ill. LEXIS 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-tavridges-inc-v-industrial-commission-ill-1965.