Wilson Shober v. . Hutchinson
This text of 74 N.C. 432 (Wilson Shober v. . Hutchinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The writ of certiorari in the place of an-appeal, is prayed for on the ground that the petitioners ought not to be prejudiced by the delay of their counsel in making up the statement of a case for the Supreme Court. This delay is attributed in the petition to the “ liberal practice among the members of the bar in that district,” &c.
"With all of this we have nothing to do. The C. C. P. specifies tiie time in which the appellant must have a case made up. For a failure to do so, the attorney is liable for damages. This seems to be a fit case in which that right of a client against his lawyef can be enforced, and perhaps an example may serve a good purpose, and hereafter lawyers will not depend upon an indefinite, general understanding “ among counsel,” but will make up the case in the time required by law, unless there be a specific arrangement in regard to it.
Per CuRrAM. Motion refused..
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 N.C. 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-shober-v-hutchinson-nc-1876.