Wilson (Robert) Vs. Warden
This text of Wilson (Robert) Vs. Warden (Wilson (Robert) Vs. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ROBERT MAURICE WILSON, No. 82981 Appellant, vs. PERRY RUSSELL, WARDEN, NNCC; AND THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Res • ondents. JUN 1 1 2021 EL1ZAB A. BriOWN C jOF PREME COU
DEP CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for counsel. Eleventh Judicial District Court, Mineral County; Jim C. Shirley, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion for counsel, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
J. C1 .24‘)1.1.""litrr Parraguirre '
, J. Stiglich Silver
cc: Hon. Jim C. Shirley, District Judge Robert Maurice Wilson Attorney General/Carson City Mineral County District Attorney SUPREME COURT Clerk of the Court/Court Administrator OF NEVADA
(o) i 937A ,441P.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wilson (Robert) Vs. Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-robert-vs-warden-nev-2021.