Wilson King and Nolan Wimberly v. Louis S. Nelson, Warden of San Quentin Penitentiary, San Quentin, California
This text of 389 F.2d 91 (Wilson King and Nolan Wimberly v. Louis S. Nelson, Warden of San Quentin Penitentiary, San Quentin, California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motion for a writ of mandamus is treated as a motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus. As such, it is denied.
The judgment dismissing the complaint is affirmed. We conclude that the facts alleged do not show that appellants were denied reasonable access to the courts.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
389 F.2d 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-king-and-nolan-wimberly-v-louis-s-nelson-warden-of-san-quentin-ca9-1968.