WILSON, JUNIOR v. FISCHER, BRIAN

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 2, 2015
DocketCA 13-01587
StatusPublished

This text of WILSON, JUNIOR v. FISCHER, BRIAN (WILSON, JUNIOR v. FISCHER, BRIAN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
WILSON, JUNIOR v. FISCHER, BRIAN, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1462 CA 13-01587 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF JUNIOR WILSON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (LEAH R. NOWOTARSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (MARCUS J. MASTRACCO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Mark H. Dadd, A.J.), entered August 2, 2013 in a CPLR article 78 proceeding. The judgment dismissed the petition.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his CPLR article 78 petition seeking to annul the determination after a tier III hearing that he violated inmate rule 113.24 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [xiv] [drug use]). Petitioner contends that his due process rights were violated because his urine sample was not tested immediately, and it therefore should have been refrigerated prior to testing. Petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedy with respect to that contention because he failed to raise it in his administrative appeal, and this Court “has no discretionary power to reach [it]” (Matter of Nelson v Coughlin, 188 AD2d 1071, 1071, appeal dismissed 81 NY2d 834).

Entered: January 2, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nelson v. Coughlin
188 A.D.2d 1071 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
WILSON, JUNIOR v. FISCHER, BRIAN, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-junior-v-fischer-brian-nyappdiv-2015.