Wilson, Jojo Kwasi
This text of Wilson, Jojo Kwasi (Wilson, Jojo Kwasi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-90, 224-01 & WR-90,224-02
EX PARTE JOJO KWASI WILSON, Applicant
ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. W15-76656-R(A) AND W16-00418-R(A) IN THE 265TH DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk
of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of the offense of
murder and sentenced to imprisonment for 45 years. He was also convicted of aggravated robbery
and sentenced to imprisonment for 61 years.
On July 5, 2019, responding to the -01 application, the State submitted a request that the trial
court enter an order designating issues to gather evidence as to why defense counsel did not bring WILSON - 2
Applicant to court on May 20, 2016, to respond to the State’s plea offer of 35 years (grounds one and
two), and to clarify whether the prosecutor made a 15-year plea offer (ground four). In the -02
application, after the State moved to dismiss Applicant’s initial application, he moved to abandon that
application and filed a supplemental application. This supplemental application alleges the same
grounds as in the -01 but with respect to a different conviction. No further action was taken on either
application.
The habeas records have been properly forwarded to this Court by the district clerk pursuant
to TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(5). However, the records have been forwarded without the trial court
having acted on the State’s request in the -01 record or Applicant’s supplemental application in the
-02 record. We remand these applications to the 265th District Court of Dallas County to allow the
trial judge to complete an evidentiary investigation and enter findings of fact and conclusions of law
on grounds one, two, and four of these applications.
These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues.
The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be
forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must be
requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.
Filed: September 25, 2019 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wilson, Jojo Kwasi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-jojo-kwasi-texcrimapp-2019.