Wilson Gun Works And Design, LLC v. Albro

• Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
• Decided: March 20, 2023
• Docket: 1:22-cv-00237
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:22-cv-00237-MOC-WCM

WILSON GUN WORKS AND ) DESIGN, LLC, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) ORDER v. ) ) STEVE ALBRO, ) ) ) ) ) Respondent. ) _______________________________ )

This matter is before the Court on a Joint Motion to Stay Rule 26 Deadlines and Set Briefing Schedule (the “Motion,” Doc. 8). On November 8, 2022, Wilson Gun Works and Design, LLC (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition seeking judicial review of the revocation of a firearms dealer’s license pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 923(f)(3). Doc. 1. On February 10, 2023, Steve Albro, Director of Industry Operations Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (“Respondent”) filed an Answer. Doc. 7. The parties were then instructed to conduct an initial attorney’s conference and submit a report, though were also advised that, if appropriate, they may file a Motion to Stay the Initial Attorney’s Conference. On March 7, 2023, the parties filed the instant Motion, in which the parties explain that “[t]here is an administrative record of the proceedings

regarding which Petitioner now seeks judicial review,” that the parties agree the “usual Rule 26 requirements do not appear to be necessary in this case,” and that Respondent plans to file a motion for summary judgment on the administrative record, to which Petitioner will respond, and Respondent will

reply. Doc. 8 at 1-2. Having reviewed the docket in this matter, and in light of the nature of the Petition for Judicial Review and the parties’ Motion, the undersigned will grant the parties’ request. See e.g. Gossard v. Fronczak, 206 F.Supp.3d 1053,

1059 (D.Md. 2016) (discussing materials considered when a petitioner seeks judicial review pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 923(f)(3) (citing American Arms Int'l v. Herbert, 563 F.3d 78, 86 (4th Cir. 2009)). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. The Joint Motion to Stay Rule 26 Deadlines and Set Briefing Schedule is GRANTED. 2. The parties are EXCUSED from conducting an initial attorneys’ conference pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure and submitting a Certificate of Initial Attorneys’ Conference. 3. The following briefing schedule is established:

a. On or before May 12, 2023, Respondent shall file its motion for Summary Judgment, Memorandum in Support, and a copy of the Administrative Record. b. On or before June 2, 2023, Petitioner shall file its opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment. c. On or before June 16, 2023, Respondent shall file its reply, if

any, 1n support of the Motion for Summary Judgment.

Signed: March 20, 2023 od ao Z

W. Carleton Metcalf hy United States Magistrate Judge alll J