WILSON GRAIN COMPANY v. Resso

140 N.W.2d 18, 179 Neb. 676, 1966 Neb. LEXIS 705
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 4, 1966
Docket36065
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 140 N.W.2d 18 (WILSON GRAIN COMPANY v. Resso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
WILSON GRAIN COMPANY v. Resso, 140 N.W.2d 18, 179 Neb. 676, 1966 Neb. LEXIS 705 (Neb. 1966).

Opinion

Spencer, J.

Wilson Grain Company, a corporation, hereinafter referred to as Wilson, instituted this action for negligence and breach of warranty against Don Resso, hereinafter referred to as Resso, and Steckley Hybrid Corn Company, hereinafter referred to as Steckley. A jury was waived. Upon trial to the court, the action was dismissed as to Steckley and judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff and against Resso in the amount of $7,179.78. Resso perfected an appeal to this court.

Wilson operates several country grain elevators, one of which is located at Murray, Nebraska. It is what is known as a one-man operation, with Richard Schanot, hereinafter referred to as Schanot, as its only employee. On August 20, 1959, Schanot purchased approximately 1,350 bushels of yellow corn from Resso at the Murray elevator. Resso had purchased this corn from Steckley at a reduced price. It was sold to Wilson as top-quality corn at the market price. It is undisputed the corn had been treated with Captan, a chemical substance used by producers of seed corn to prevent soil-borne diseases. *678 Steckley had used a light pink coloring on the corn to identify it as treated corn. There is a dispute as to whether Captan-treated corn is fit for livestock feed, but there is no dispute it is not fit for human consumption.

It is also* undisputed that the Federal Seed Act required the labeling of seed corn treated with Captan when sold or offered for sale in interstate commerce. That act also required a statement of limitation against use of such corn for feed, food, or oil purposes, to> be placed on the container holding it. At the time Resso purchased the corn he knew it was packaged in bags which were labeled to indicate the fact it had been treated with Cap-tan, and should not be used for feed, food, or oil purposes. Steckley, at his direction, emptied the corn from the labeled sacks directly into the truck. No supervision or control was exercised by Steckley after the com was sold to Resso. It was stipulated that Resso signed an agreement with Steckley at the time he purchased the corn that he would not mill the corn nor resell it to any party for the purpose of milling or using the same for feed, food, or oil purposes, nor would he sell the corn to any person who might place it in regular channels of commerce wherein the corn might be susceptible to such use. It is also evident that Resso hauled the corn directly from Steckley to the Wilson elevator at Murray.

During the unloading of the first truckload of the com into the elevator pit at Murray, Schanot noticed that some of the corn had a pink cast, and when he called Resso’s attention to- it, he was informed that this was because it had been marked to distinguish it as 2-year-old corn. Schanot’s testimony is as follows: “I said, ‘Don, I don’t know if I can use the corn. I may have to load this corn back up.’ He said, ‘Why?’ I said, ‘What’s this pink coloring on this corn?’ He said, ‘That’s nothing but cake dye.’ I said, ‘Was this Steckley’s corn?’ He said, ‘Yes, this was Steckley’s corn. That’s nothing but cake dye where they determine their two-year-old corn.’ *679 I said, ‘Well, I will have to go in and call the office.’ So, I said, ‘Come on in with me.’ He came in the office with me and I set down at the desk at the phone. He was standing beside the phone. Standing beside the desk. I talked to Mr. Noske and I told him that I was getting in this corn, this corn I talked to him about before from Resso, and it had coloring on it. First thing he asked me, if it had been treated with anything poisonous; and I turned and asked Mr. Resso-. He said, ‘No; this corn is not treated with anything poisonous. All that is is a cake dye to determine the corn, determine the year of the com. That cake dye would determine the year of the com.’ So I told Mr. Noske what — he was waiting on the phone when I asked Mr. Resso- abo-ut this — and Mr. Noske said then, ‘If the corn hasn’t — if he claims the corn isn’t treated with anything poisonous, why go ahead and take it.’ ”

Resso was not present -and did not testify at the trial, but it was stipulated that if present he would testify that he told Schanot he acquired some seed com from Steckley which he would be willing to- sell at a reasonable figure because it had been treated and could not be used for any purpose other than livestock feed. This testimony lacks credence considering the price Wilson paid Resso for the corn. Wilson’s evidence indicates it was purchased as best quality corn and priced accordingly. The corn was dumped into the elevator pit, where it was carried into the elevator by conveyor buckets. It is undisputed the only corn to which a coloring agent had been added and handled by Wilson during this period was the Resso com.

Wilson at that time held a contract or license with the Commodity Credit Corporation to- handle government grain called in for delivery from the farms on which it had been stored. This contract permitted Wilson to commingle the grain, and required only that grain of equal quality be delivered to the destination designated by the Commodity Credit Corporation. On. August *680 19, 1959, Wilson was directed by the Commodity Credit Corporation to ship 16 carloads of yellow corn to St. Joseph, Missouri.

Because railroad cars were not readily available, it was necessary that some of the corn, when delivered to Wilson, would be put into the elevator and transferred to cars when they were available. When the first two cars were received at the elevator, Wilson did not have enough Commodity Credit Corporation corn on hand to ship> out, and, under its commingling agreement, filled the cars with grain in the elevator, including some of the Resso corn.

There are two' methods of loading corn into cars at the Murray elevator. One is the truck weight method whereby grain is weighed on the trucks and loaded directly into the cars. This method was used for the third car. The second method is the hopper scale method whereby grain is moved through the bins in the elevator, weighed through a hopper scale located under a scale bin, and then elevated into the car. The first, second, fourth, and fifth cars were loaded by the hopper scale method. The balance of the Resso' corn was loaded into the fourth and fifth cars.

The shipments were inspected and sampled at St. Joseph, Missouri, by a representative of the Food and Drug Administration, and cars Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5, which contained corn with which the Resso corn had been commingled, were found to be contaminated and unsuitable for either human or animal consumption because of the presence of an unknown substance which was later identified as Captan. The Commodity Credit Corporation stopped all payments to Wilson, and it was directed to appear in federal court at Kansas City, Missouri, on an investigation of a charge of violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Before the stop order, a total of 13 cars had been shipped from Murray. Only the four cars containing Resso corn were condemned.

The condemnation of the four cars of corn caused *681 Wilson to lose the value of the corn; its license to handle Commodity Credit Corporation grain was suspended at all of its elevators; it was necessary to incur expense to get the matter adjusted; and Wilson suffered losses as a result thereof.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Simmons v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n
180 N.W.2d 672 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 N.W.2d 18, 179 Neb. 676, 1966 Neb. LEXIS 705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-grain-company-v-resso-neb-1966.