Wilson ex rel. Devlin v. McDermott

86 A. 500, 84 N.J.L. 403, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 188
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 3, 1913·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The same facts, with the exception that the relator at the time of his removal was deputy warden of Hudson county jail, exist in this case as were present in Sullivan v. McOsker, ante p. 380. For the reasons stated in the opinion of that case the judgment of the Supreme Court will he reversed with direction that the demurrer he overruled.

For affirmance — None.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Trenohard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Congdon, Treacy, JJ. 9.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson ex rel. Devlin v. McDermott, 86 A. 500, 84 N.J.L. 403, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 188 (N.J. 1913).

86 A. 500 (Wilson ex rel. Devlin v. McDermott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.