Wilson ex rel. Devlin v. McDermott
86 A. 500, 84 N.J.L. 403, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 188
Opinion
The same facts, with the exception that the relator at the time of his removal was deputy warden of Hudson county jail, exist in this case as were present in Sullivan v. McOsker, ante p. 380. For the reasons stated in the opinion of that case the judgment of the Supreme Court will he reversed with direction that the demurrer he overruled.
For affirmance — None.
For reversal — The Chancellor, Trenohard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Congdon, Treacy, JJ. 9.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilson ex rel. Devlin v. McDermott, 86 A. 500, 84 N.J.L. 403, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 188 (N.J. 1913).
86 A. 500 (Wilson ex rel. Devlin v. McDermott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.