Wilson Estes Police Architects, Inc. v. Al Cardenas Masonry, Inc. and Cardenas Masonry, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 1, 2009
Docket13-09-00339-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Wilson Estes Police Architects, Inc. v. Al Cardenas Masonry, Inc. and Cardenas Masonry, Inc. (Wilson Estes Police Architects, Inc. v. Al Cardenas Masonry, Inc. and Cardenas Masonry, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson Estes Police Architects, Inc. v. Al Cardenas Masonry, Inc. and Cardenas Masonry, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-09-00339-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

WILSON ESTES POLICE ARCHITECTS, INC., Appellant,

v.

AL CARDENAS MASONRY, INC. AND CARDENAS MASONRY, INC., Appellees.

On Appeal from the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

This appeal was abated by this Court on August 3, 2009, to allow the parties to file

dismissal documents in the trial court and to exchange mutual settlement agreements and

releases. This cause is now before the Court on appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss

the appeal on grounds that the underlying lawsuit from which this appeal arises has been dismissed with prejudice as to all parties. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the

appeal. Accordingly, this case is hereby REINSTATED.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed

motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX .

R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby

DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent

agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed

the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our

mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 1st day of October, 2009.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wilson Estes Police Architects, Inc. v. Al Cardenas Masonry, Inc. and Cardenas Masonry, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-estes-police-architects-inc-v-al-cardenas-m-texapp-2009.