Wilson Earl Love v. State of Nevada, et al.

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided November 14, 2025·No. 2:25-cv-01042·Unknown

Opinion

DISTRICT OF NEVADA Wilson Earl Love, Case No. 2:25-cv-01042-CDS-NJK

Plaintiff Order Adopting Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and Closing Case v.

State of Nevada, et al., [ECF No. 10]

Defendants

Plaintiff Wilson Love initiated this lawsuit by filing an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) alongside his complaint. ECF No. 1; ECF No. 1-1. United States Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe granted Love’s IFP application, screened his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), and dismissed Love’s claims with leave to amend. Order, ECF No. 5. After screening Love’s amended complaint, Judge Koppe issued a report and recommendation (R&R) that I dismiss the amended complaint with prejudice because Love’s claims are barred by the Heck doctrine and the statute of limitations, and because Love fails to adequately plead a civil rights claim. R&R, ECF No. 10 at 3 (citing Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 484 (1994)). Love had until October 31, 2025, to file any objections to the R&R. Local Rule IB 3-2(a) (stating that parties wishing to object to an R&R must file specific written objections with supporting points and authorities within fourteen days); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) (same). Love has neither objected to the R&R nor requested more time to do so. Thus, “no review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.” Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). I nonetheless reviewed the magistrate judge’s findings and agree with the analysis and conclusion. So I accept the R&R in full. 1 Conclusion 2 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 3] R&R [ECF No. 10] is accepted and adopted in its entirety. This action is dismissed with prejudice. 5 The Clerk of Court is kindly directed to enter judgment accordingly, and to close this 6] case. /, ) / 7 Dated: November 14, 2025 LZ Cristiha B. Silva 9 Uni d States District Judge / ll

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson Earl Love v. State of Nevada, et al., (D. Nev. 2025).

Wilson Earl Love v. State of Nevada, et al. (Wilson Earl Love v. State of Nevada, et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)
Heck v. Humphrey
512 U.S. 477 (Supreme Court, 1994)
Schmidt v. Johnstone
263 F. Supp. 2d 1219 (D. Arizona, 2003)