Wilson Cypress Co. v. Pozo Y Mascos

Fifth Circuit

Wilson Cypress Co. v. Pozo Y Mascos

202 F. 742, 121 C.C.A. 578, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1057

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 4, 1913

DocketNo. 2,354

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 202 F. 742 (Wilson Cypress Co. v. Pozo Y Mascos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson Cypress Co. v. Pozo Y Mascos, 202 F. 742, 121 C.C.A. 578, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1057 (5th Cir. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The lands in controversy were not segregated from the public domain, and the title thereto remained in the United States until the issuance of the patent; therefore they were not taxable by the state of Florida at the several times they were listed for taxes and sold for nonpayment thereof.

In the other questions involved in the case we find no reversible error.

The decree appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The lands in controversy were not segregated from the public domain, and the title thereto remained in the United States until the issuance of the patent; therefore they were not taxable by the state of Florida at the several times they were listed for taxes and sold for nonpayment thereof.

In the other questions involved in the case we find no reversible error.

The decree appealed from is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 F. 742, 121 C.C.A. 578, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-cypress-co-v-pozo-y-mascos-ca5-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack