Wilson & Co. v. Moore

1932 OK 513, 12 P.2d 693, 158 Okla. 140, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 948
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided June 28, 1932·No. 23110·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

McNEILL, J.

Review of an award made by Industrial Commission. The major proposition involved is whether there is competent evidence to substantiate the award, as to the permanency of respondent’s disability, due to the dislocation of his shoulder. The injury was compensable. If it is permanent, respondent is entitled to the award. A review of this record does not justify an award for permanent disability. The cause is remanded to the Commission, with directions to hear further testimony on this question. If respondent fails to produce competent evidence showing the permanency of such disability, the Commission is directed to dismiss the same.

HEFNER,- CULLISON, SWINDALL, and *141 ANDREWS, JJ., concur. KORNEGAY, J., dissents. LESTER, O. J., CLARK, V. O. J.,. and RILEY, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson & Co. v. Moore, 1932 OK 513, 12 P.2d 693, 158 Okla. 140, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 948 (Okla. 1932).

1932 OK 513 (Wilson & Co. v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson & Co. v. Moore
1933 OK 268 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1933)