Wilson & Co. v. Millner

116 S.E. 122, 29 Ga. App. 265, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 227
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 12, 1922·No. 13795·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Luke, J. 1.

“ Where the issues of a ease are submitted to the judge, without the intervention of a jury, for his decision upon all matters of fact and of law, and he renders a judgment therein in term time, the losing party may review the judgment either by a direct bill of exceptions or by a motion for new trial.” Chance v. Simpkins, 146 Ga. 519 (1) (91 S. E. 773). Under this ruling, the motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions is denied.

2. The evidence demanded a finding for the plaintiff, and the court erred in rendering a judgment in favor of the defendant.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson & Co. v. Millner, 116 S.E. 122, 29 Ga. App. 265, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 227 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

116 S.E. 122 (Wilson & Co. v. Millner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gibson v. Wood
61 S.E.2d 125 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
Morris v. Shaw
160 S.E. 820 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)