Wilson & Co. v. Millner

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Wilson & Co. v. Millner

116 S.E. 122, 29 Ga. App. 265, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 227

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 12, 1922

Docket13795

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 116 S.E. 122 (Wilson & Co. v. Millner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson & Co. v. Millner, 116 S.E. 122, 29 Ga. App. 265, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 227 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J. 1.

“ Where the issues of a ease are submitted to the judge, without the intervention of a jury, for his decision upon all matters of fact and of law, and he renders a judgment therein in term time, the losing party may review the judgment either by a direct bill of exceptions or by a motion for new trial.” Chance v. Simpkins, 146 Ga. 519 (1) (91 S. E. 773). Under this ruling, the motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions is denied.

2. The evidence demanded a finding for the plaintiff, and the court erred in rendering a judgment in favor of the defendant.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI