Wilson & Co. v. Louisiana
This text of 293 U.S. 518 (Wilson & Co. v. Louisiana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Knights of Pythias v. Meyer, 265 U. S. 30, 32, 33; Guaranty Trust Co. v. Blodgett, 287 U. S. 509, 513; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Sunburst Co., 287 U. S. 358, 362; Hicklin v. Coney, 290 U. S. 169, 172; Hartford Accident Co. v. Nelson Co., 291 U. S. 352, 358. (2) Kehrer v. Stewart, 197 U. S. 60, 65; Sonneborn Bros. v. Cureton, 262 U. S. 506; Eastern Air Transport v. Tax Commission, 285 U. S. 147, 152; Gregg Dyeing Co. v. Query, 286 U. S. 472, 478, 479; Liggett Co. v. Lee, 288 U. S. 517, 539; Magnano Co. v. Hamilton, 292 U. S. 40, 44-47.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
293 U.S. 518, 55 S. Ct. 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-co-v-louisiana-scotus-1934.