Wilson, Clint Weldon
This text of Wilson, Clint Weldon (Wilson, Clint Weldon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-85,573-02
EX PARTE CLINT WELDON WILSON, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. F8775 IN THE 8TH DISTRICT COURT FROM FRANKLIN COUNTY
ALCALA , J., filed a concurring opinion.
CONCURRING OPINION
I join this Court’s remand order because I agree with its observation that applicant has alleged
facts that, “if true, might entitle him to relief.” Because applicant has pleaded a colorable
ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, I would order the habeas court on remand to appoint counsel
for him upon request if he is indigent, regardless of whether the trial court holds a hearing. See Ex
parte Pointer, 492 S.W.3d 318, 320-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016) (per curiam) (Alcala, J., concurring).
At a minimum, however, in addition to the order’s current admonition that the appointment of
counsel is mandatory for an indigent applicant upon request if the habeas court holds a hearing, I
would include a further admonishment that an indigent applicant is “entitled” to the appointment of
counsel upon request “if the court concludes that the interests of justice require representation.” See
TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. ART . 1.051(d).
Filed: November 16, 2016 Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wilson, Clint Weldon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-clint-weldon-texcrimapp-2016.