Wilson Barron Coleman IV v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 11, 2016
Docket09-15-00521-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Wilson Barron Coleman IV v. State (Wilson Barron Coleman IV v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson Barron Coleman IV v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-15-00521-CR ________________

WILSON BARRON COLEMAN IV, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee __________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 298460 __________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On March 22, 2016, we notified the parties that the appeal would be

dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the

record or the appellant explained why he needed time for filing the record. The

appellant did not file a response. It appears that the appellant is not entitled to

proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. There being no

satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). 1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN Chief Justice

Submitted on May 10, 2016 Opinion Delivered May 11, 2016 Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wilson Barron Coleman IV v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-barron-coleman-iv-v-state-texapp-2016.