Wilson Barron Coleman IV v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 11, 2016·No. 09-15-00521-CR·Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

NO. 09-15-00521-CR

WILSON BARRON COLEMAN IV, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 298460

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On March 22, 2016, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained why he needed time for filing the record. The appellant did not file a response. It appears that the appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice

Submitted on May 10, 2016 Opinion Delivered May 11, 2016 Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson Barron Coleman IV v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Wilson Barron Coleman IV v. State (Wilson Barron Coleman IV v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.