Wilsky v. McDonough

941 So. 2d 1268, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19556, 2006 WL 3371577
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 22, 2006·No. No. 1D06-1255·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Consistent with the Attorney General’s concession of error under Schmidt v. Crusoe, 878 So.2d 361 (Fla.2003), we grant the petition for writ of certiorari, quash the lower court’s orders in this case, and remand for further proceedings on the merits of the petition for writ of mandamus.

ERVIN, ALLEN, and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilsky v. McDonough, 941 So. 2d 1268, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19556, 2006 WL 3371577 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

941 So. 2d 1268 (Wilsky v. McDonough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schmidt v. Crusoe
878 So. 2d 361 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)