Wilrock National, Inc. v. Newmark & Company Real Estate, Inc.

204 A.D.2d 206, 612 N.Y.S.2d 864

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered on or about March 23, 1993, which denied plaintiff’s motion for a stay of arbitration and granted defendant Newmark & Company’s motion for a stay [207]*207of discovery in this judicial action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS Court properly determined that plaintiff’s allegations of tortious conduct concerning a real estate commission are arbitrable pursuant to section 1 of article XIII of the Constitution of the Real Estate Board of New York, Inc. since they "pertain * * * to * * * business relations” between plaintiff and defendant Newmark. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Ross and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilrock National, Inc. v. Newmark & Company Real Estate, Inc., 204 A.D.2d 206, 612 N.Y.S.2d 864 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

204 A.D.2d 206 (Wilrock National, Inc. v. Newmark & Company Real Estate, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.