Wilmot v. Methodist Hospital
This text of 202 A.D.2d 304 (Wilmot v. Methodist Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment, Supreme Court, Kings County (Leonard Scholnick, J.), entered January 25, 1991, upon a verdict in favor of defendants and against plaintiffs, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The question of whether to permit the introduction of rebuttal evidence rests within the sound discretion of the trial court, and the court’s decision in that regard should not ordinarily be disturbed on appeal absent a clear abuse of discretion. "No such abuse of discretion infects the trial court’s ruling in the instant matter, and we perceive no reason to substitute our discretion for that of the Trial Judge.” (Saleh v Sears, Roebuck & Co., 119 AD2d 652, 653, lv denied 68 NY2d 611.) Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 A.D.2d 304, 609 N.Y.S.2d 768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilmot-v-methodist-hospital-nyappdiv-1994.