Wilmington Trust, National Association v. Hashida

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Wilmington Trust, National Association v. Hashida

CourtHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 10, 2022

DocketCAAP-21-0000525

StatusPublished

This text of Wilmington Trust, National Association v. Hashida (Wilmington Trust, National Association v. Hashida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilmington Trust, National Association v. Hashida, (hawapp 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 10-MAR-2022 09:10 AM Dkt. 32 OGMD NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY IN ITS CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF MFRA TRUST 2015-1, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DARRY MASATOSHI HASHIDA, Defendant-Appellant, and BENEFICIAL FINANCIAL I INC.; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; STATE OF HAWAI#I, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION; VILLAGE PARK COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, Defendants-Appellees, and JOHN DOES 1-50; JANE DOES 1-50; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-50; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-50; DOE ENTITIES 1-50; and DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-50, Defendants-Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 1CC121002843)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and McCullen, JJ.) Upon consideration of the Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice (Stipulation), filed February 24, 2022, by Plaintiff-Appellee Wilmington Trust, National Association, not in Its Individual Capacity but Solely in Its Capacity as Trustee of MFRA Trust 2015-1, the papers in support, and the record, it appears that: (1) the appeal has been docketed; (2) the parties stipulate to dismiss the appeal with prejudice; (3) the Stipulation is dated and signed by counsel for all parties appearing in the appeal; (4) the record reflects that appellate filing fees were paid; NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(5) the Stipulation does not specify the terms as to payment of costs, as set forth in Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 42(b); and (6) because the requirements for a stipulation under HRAP Rule 42(b) have not been met, we construe the Stipulation as a motion under HRAP Rule 42(b). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed with prejudice. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 10, 2022.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard Associate Judge

/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 10-MAR-2022 09:10 AM Dkt. 32 OGMD NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY IN ITS CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF MFRA TRUST 2015-1, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DARRY MASATOSHI HASHIDA, Defendant-Appellant, and BENEFICIAL FINANCIAL I INC.; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; STATE OF HAWAI#I, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION; VILLAGE PARK COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, Defendants-Appellees, and JOHN DOES 1-50; JANE DOES 1-50; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-50; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-50; DOE ENTITIES 1-50; and DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-50, Defendants-Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 1CC121002843)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and McCullen, JJ.) Upon consideration of the Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice (Stipulation), filed February 24, 2022, by Plaintiff-Appellee Wilmington Trust, National Association, not in Its Individual Capacity but Solely in Its Capacity as Trustee of MFRA Trust 2015-1, the papers in support, and the record, it appears that: (1) the appeal has been docketed; (2) the parties stipulate to dismiss the appeal with prejudice; (3) the Stipulation is dated and signed by counsel for all parties appearing in the appeal; (4) the record reflects that appellate filing fees were paid; NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(5) the Stipulation does not specify the terms as to payment of costs, as set forth in Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 42(b); and (6) because the requirements for a stipulation under HRAP Rule 42(b) have not been met, we construe the Stipulation as a motion under HRAP Rule 42(b). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed with prejudice. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 10, 2022.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard Associate Judge

/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Wilmington Trust, National Association v. Hashida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilmington-trust-national-association-v-hashida-hawapp-2022.