Wilmington Trust N A v. Plaza Investments II Holdings L L C

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana
DecidedSeptember 23, 2024
Docket5:24-cv-01275
StatusUnknown

This text of Wilmington Trust N A v. Plaza Investments II Holdings L L C (Wilmington Trust N A v. Plaza Investments II Holdings L L C) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilmington Trust N A v. Plaza Investments II Holdings L L C, (W.D. La. 2024).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION

WILMINGTON TRUST N A CIVIL ACTION NO. 24-cv-1275

VERSUS JUDGE S. MAURICE HICKS, JR.

PLAZA INVESTMENTS II HOLDINGS, LLC MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY ET AL

MEMORANDUM ORDER Wilmington Trust National Association filed this civil action against two LLCs based on an assertion of diversity jurisdiction. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(a)(2) requires that parties in an action in which jurisdiction is based on diversity must file a disclosure statement that names and identifies the citizenship of every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to that party. The parties are granted until October 9, 2024 to file a Diversity Jurisdiction Disclosure Statement for each party. Wilmington notes in the complaint that a national banking association is deemed a citizen of the state in which it is “located” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1348. Wilmington alleges that its headquarters and principal place of business are located in Delaware. More specificity is required because the Supreme Court has interpreted the statute to mean that “a national bank … is a citizen of the State in which its main office, as set forth in its articles of association, is located.” Wachovia Bank v. Schmidt, 126 S.Ct. 941 (2006). That is not necessarily the same place as a bank’s principal place of business or headquarters. Choice Hospice, Inc. v. Axxess Tech. Sols., Inc., 2024 WL 758558, *4 (N.D. Tex. 2024). With respect to the defendants, the citizenship of an LLC is determined by the citizenship of all of its members, with its state of organization or principal place of business being irrelevant. Harvey v. Grey Wolf Drilling Co., 542 F.3d 1077 (Sth Cir. 2008). “A party seeking to establish diversity jurisdiction must specifically allege the citizenship of every member of every LLC or partnership involved in a litigation.” Settlement Funding, L.L.C. v. Rapid Settlements, Ltd., 851 F.3d 530, 536 (Sth Cir. 2017). If the members are themselves partnerships, LLCs, corporations or other form of entity, their citizenship must be alleged in accordance with the rules applicable to that entity, and the citizenship must be traced through however many layers of members or partners there may be. Mullins v. TestAmerica Inc., 564 F.3d 386, 397-98 (Sth Cir. 2009); Rodidaco, Inc. v. Chesapeake Energy Louisiana Corp. 2018 WL 3551525 (W.D. La. 2018). Specificity of membership is required, even with complex organizations. It is not sufficient, for example, to allege that an LLC is “wholly owned” by someone. SXSW, L.L.C. v. Fed. Ins. Co., 83 F.4th 405, 408 (Sth Cir. 2023). THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Shreveport, Louisiana, this 23rd day of September, 2024. =| Mark L. Hornsby U.S. Magistrate Judge

Page 2 of 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harvey v. Grey Wolf Drilling Co.
542 F.3d 1077 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)
Wachovia Bank, National Ass'n v. Schmidt
546 U.S. 303 (Supreme Court, 2006)
Mullins v. TestAmerica, Inc.
564 F.3d 386 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)
SXSW v. Federal Insurance
83 F.4th 405 (Fifth Circuit, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wilmington Trust N A v. Plaza Investments II Holdings L L C, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilmington-trust-n-a-v-plaza-investments-ii-holdings-l-l-c-lawd-2024.