Wilmington Transp. Co. v. The Old Kensington

39 F. 496, 14 Sawy. 102, 1889 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144
District Court, S.D. California·Decided July 1, 1889·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Ross, J.

This is a cause of salvage. That salvage services were rendered by libelant is not denied, but the parties are not agreed as to when such services were commenced, nor as to the amount the libelant should be awarded. It appears from the evidence that the ship Old Kensington was, on Sunday, April 7th, lying in the bay of San Pedro with a cargo of 2,641 tons of coal. The night before the attention of her master, Capt. Jones, was called to what then appeared to be steam coming up the ventilator and hatchway, but it became so much denser the next morning that he requested the master of two other ships then in the bay (Capt. Skinner, of the Banduara, and Capt. McRitchie, of the Apaye) to repair on board and with him examine into the cause. That examination disclosed the fact that what at first appeared to be steam was in fact smoke, and that there was fire somewhere in the ship; and it was then deemed best to endeavor to smother the fire, and also to make preparations for the discharge of the coal so as to reach the seat of the fire. Accordingly the captain directed the hatches to be closed, and then went ashore to arrange with the libelant for the discharge of the cargo. This was Sunday afternoon, about 2 or 3 o’clock, and, the day making it inconvenient to get the required men together, and the captain not then [497] anticipating any immediate danger, he arranged with the libelant for the sending by the latter of lighters and men the next morning to get the coal out. The next morning, Monday, libelant sent lighters and men, and the discharging of the cargo was commenced, the ship’s men working in the hold. About 6 o’clock in the morning of that day three of the ship’s pumps were put to work pumping water into her wherever they could get it, and this, together with the discharging, was continued as well as possible until midnight, at which time it became impossible for the men to remain in the hold because of the density of the smoke. The hatches were therefore again put down and the ship’s pumps continued pumping water into the hold during the night. Meanwhile about 180 tons of coal had been discharged. Early the next morning, Tuesday, Capt. Jones again requested the advice of Capts. Skinner and McRitchie, who, after making a survey of the ship, recommended that she be put aground, and that water be pumped into her hold until the fire should become extinguished. At this time, it was thought, by Capt. Skinner at least, that the fire was both fore and alt, but an examination made after the discharge of the cargo showed the seat of the fire to have been on the starboard side, just abreast of the main mast, where the ceiling of the ship was burned through in several places for a space of about 6 feet in width and 16 feet in length and about 25 tons of coal burned or charred. For the purpose of carrying out the recommendation of Capts. Skinner and McRitchie, Capt. Jones went on shore about 11 o’clock on Tuesday morning, and endeavored to arrange with the libelant i'or the towing of the ship ashore, and for such other and further services as the exigencies of the case might demand. The libelant was willing to, and did, agree with the captain to tow the ship ashore for a stipulated sum, $500, but would not make any agreement as to compensation for any other or further services, for the reason that it was impossible to anticipate what other or further services would be required; but the libelant was ready and willing to perform such other and further services as should be needed, and did do so upon the request of the captain of the ship, as will presently be stated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilmington Transp. Co. v. The Old Kensington, 39 F. 496, 14 Sawy. 102, 1889 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144 (S.D. Cal. 1889).

39 F. 496 (Wilmington Transp. Co. v. The Old Kensington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crain Bros. v. Hartford Fire Insurance
149 F. Supp. 663 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1957)
The Aurora
194 F. 559 (W.D. Wisconsin, 1912)