Wilmington Savings Fund v. Yun, G.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 21, 2017·No. 113 MM 2017·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND : No. 113 MM 2017 SOCIETY, FSB, DOING BUSINESS AS : CHRISTIANA TRUST, NOT IN ITS : INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, BUT SOLELY : AS TRUSTEE FOR BCAT 2015-14 ATT : ASSIGNEE OF BANK OF AMERICA, : N.A., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO : BAC HOME LOAN SERVICING, L.P., : F/K/A COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOAN : SERVICING, LP, :

:

Respondent :

: :

v. :

: :

GLORIA S. YUN, :

:

Petitioner :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of September, 2017, the Motion for Reconsideration to

File Nunc Pro Tunc and the Application for Leave to File Addendum are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilmington Savings Fund v. Yun, G., (Pa. 2017).

Wilmington Savings Fund v. Yun, G. (Wilmington Savings Fund v. Yun, G.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.