Wilmington Savings Fund Socy., FSB v. Mallikarjun

2024 NY Slip Op 31544(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, New York County
DecidedApril 29, 2024
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 31544(U) (Wilmington Savings Fund Socy., FSB v. Mallikarjun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilmington Savings Fund Socy., FSB v. Mallikarjun, 2024 NY Slip Op 31544(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2024).

Opinion

Wilmington Savings Fund Socy., FSB v Mallikarjun 2024 NY Slip Op 31544(U) April 29, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 850224/2021 Judge: Francis A. Kahn III Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. [FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/30/2024 04:39 P~ INDEX NO. 850224/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 78 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/30/2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. FRANCIS A. KAHN, Ill PART 32 Justice -----------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 850224/2021 WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, NOT IN MOTION DATE ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY AS OWNER TRUSTEE OF CSMC 2018-SP3 TRUST, MOTION SEQ. NO. 001 Plaintiff,

- V -

SREERAM MALLIKARJUN, BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE ORION CONDOMINIUM HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, CITY OF NEW YORK ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD, CITY OF NEW YORK PARKING DECISION + ORDER ON VIOLATIONS BUREAU, CITY OF NEW YORK TRANSIT MOTION ADJUDICATION BUREAU, JOHN DOE, SAID NAME BEING FICTITIOUS, IT BEING THE INTENTION OF PLAINTIFF TO DESIGNATE ANY AND ALL OCCUPANTS OF PREMISES BEING FORECLOSED HEREIN, AND ANY

Defendant. --------------------------------------------------------------X

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77 ORDER OF REFERENCE/REFERENCE TO were read on this motion to/for COMPUTE

Upon the foregoing documents, the motion and cross-motion are determined as follows:

This is an action to foreclose on a mortgage encumbering residential real property located at at 350 West 42nd Street Apartment 53C, New York, New York. The mortgagor Sreeram Mallikarjun ("Mallikarjun") defaulted in appearing at two CPLR §3408 conferences and appearing in this action. Defendant Board of Managers of the Orion Condominium Homeowners Association ("Board") answered and pied four crossclaims, but no affirmative defenses.

Now, Plaintiff moves for a default judgment against the non-appearing parties, for an order of reference, for an extension of time to serve Defendant Board and to amend the caption. Defendant Board cross-moves for, inter alia, summary judgment on its crossclaims and the appointment of a receiver for the collection of rent. Neither Plaintiff nor Board opposes the other parties' motion.

The branches of Plaintiffs motion for a default judgment on its causes of action for a default judgment on its foreclosure cause of action and appointment of a referee to compute are granted without opposition. The branch of the motion to extend Plaintiffs time to serve Board, or to ratify its service, is denied as unnecessary. Board appeared in this action and filed an answer without a personal jurisdiction defense. As such, a claim that service upon Board was defective was waived (CPLR §3211 [e]).

850224/2021 WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY Page 1 of 4 BUT SOLELY AS OWNER TRUSTEE OF CSMC 2018-SP3 TRUST vs. MALLIKARJUN, SREERAM ET AL Motion No. 001

[* 1] 1 of 4 [FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/30/2024 04:39 P~ INDEX NO. 850224/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 78 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/30/2024

The branch of Board's cross-motion for issuance of a money judgment against Mallikarjun for unpaid common charges is granted without opposition. As to the branch of the motion for the appointment of a receiver, despite Mallikarjun's contractual assent, the appointment is not perfunctory and a court, in the exercise of it equitable power, retains the discretion to deny the appointment of a receiver (see ADHY Advisors LLC. v 530 W 152nd St. LLC, 82 AD3d 619 (1 st Dept 2011]; see also Nechadim Corp. v Simmons, 171 AD3d 1195, 1197 [2 nd Dept 2019]). As it does not appear that the premises are in imminent danger, are presently inadequate security for Plaintiffs debt or that a prolonged litigation is presently likely, the Court finds that it is an appropriate exercise of its discretion to decline to appoint a temporary receiver at present.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the motion for a default judgment against the non-appearing parties and the appointment of a referee to compute is granted without opposition; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendant Board of Managers of the Orion Condominium Homeowners Association is granted summary judgment on its second and fourth crossclaims against Defendant Sreeram Mallikarjun; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendant Board of Managers of the Orion Condominium Homeowners Association may enter a money judgment with the New York County Clerk for $23,162.38, representing unpaid common charges incurred after July 1, 2022, together with statutory interest from that date until the entry of judgment. Plaintiff is also granted costs to be award upon submission to the Clerk of an appropriate bill of costs; and it is further

ORDERED that Doron Leiby, Esq., 32 Broadway, 13th Floor, New York, New York 10004 - 212-227-4200 is hereby appointed Referee in accordance with RP APL § 1321 to compute the amount due to Plaintiff and examine whether the tax parcel can be sold in parcels; and it is further

ORDERED that if a Defendant appears and contests the amount due, in the discretion of the Referee, a hearing may be held, and testimony taken, otherwise the Referee shall hold no hearing and take no testimony or evidence other than by written submission; and it is further

ORDERED that by accepting this appointment the Referee certifies that he is in compliance with Part 36 of the Rules of the Chief Judge (22 NYCRR Part 36), including, but not limited to §36.2 (c) ("Disqualifications from appointment"), and §36.2 (d) ("Limitations on appointments based upon compensation"), and, if the Referee is disqualified from receiving an appointment pursuant to the provisions of that Rule, the Referee shall immediately notify the Appointing Judge; and it is further

ORDERED that, pursuant to CPLR 8003(a), and in the discretion of the court, a fee of $350 shall be paid to the Referee for the computation of the amount due and upon the filing of his report and the Referee shall not request or accept additional compensation for the computation unless it has been fixed by the court in accordance with CPLR 8003(b); and it is further

ORDERED that the Referee is prohibited from accepting or retaining any funds for himself or paying funds to himself without compliance with Part 36 of the Rules of the Chief Administrative Judge; and it is further

850224/2021 WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY Page 2 of 4 BUT SOLELY AS OWNER TRUSTEE OF CSMC 2018-SP3 TRUST vs. MALLIKARJUN, SREERAM ET AL Motion No. 001

2 of 4 [* 2] [FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/30/2024 04:39 P~ INDEX NO. 850224/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 78 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/30/2024

ORDERED that if the Referee holds a hearing or is required to perform other significant services in issuing the report, the Referee may seek additional compensation at the Referee's usual and customary hourly rate; and it is further

ORDERED that plaintiff shall forward all necessary documents to the Referee and to defendants who have appeared in this case within 30 days of the date of this order and shall promptly respond to every inquiry made by the referee (promptly means within two business days); and it is further

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ADHY Advisors LLC v. 530 West 152nd Street LLC
82 A.D.3d 619 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 31544(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilmington-savings-fund-socy-fsb-v-mallikarjun-nysupctnewyork-2024.