Wilmington Savings Fund Society v. Joyce

• Court: Superior Court of Maine
• Decided: August 1, 2016
• Docket: CUMre-15-041
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, ss CIVIL ACTION / Docket No. RE-15-041

WILMINGTON SAVIN GS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, AS TRUSTEE FOR STANWICH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST A,

Plaintiff RECEIVED v. DECISION AND ORDER

KATHLEEN M. JOYCE,

Defendant

This complaint for foreclosure was scheduled for trial on July 18, 2016 by notice

from the court dated June 15, 2016. Both parties were represented by counsel.

This is the second action for foreclosure filed against this defendant involving the

real property located at 45 Winn Road, Falmouth, Maine. The first action was

dismissed without prejudice one day before trial based on then plaintiff's counsel's

representation that

On or about October 2, 2013, Plaintiff instructed its undersigned counsel to dismiss the above-captioned action [Bank of America, N.A. v. Kathleen M. Joyce] as the loan that is the subject of the case at bar is on a HOLD in accordance with provisions of settlement with the Department of Justice and Plaintiff cannot move any closer to foreclosure at this time.

(Pl.'s Mot. Dismiss in RE-12-098.) Defendant's counsel stated at the July 2016 trial that

he is familiar with all of the Bank of America settlement agreements and this offered

basis for a dismissal was not accurate.

By the time of the July 2016 trial, four entities had been involved with the note

and mortgage at issue in this case: Bank of America, Ocwen, BSI, and Kerrington

Mortgage Services, LLC. At trial, plaintiff's counsel was unable to establish that the one

1 .I

witness whose testimony plaintiff intended to offer at trial was qualified to testify about

the business records of the four entities involved. M.R. Evid. 803(6); see Homeward

Residential, Inc. v. Gregor, 2015 ME 108,

Carter, 2011 ME 77,

complaint without prejudice. Defendant objected and requested that the court dismiss

the complaint with prejudice based on the history of defendant's note and mortgage

and the fact that plaintiff was unprepared to prove its case at trial.

This is not a lack of standing case that requires a dismissal without prejudice.

See Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Halfacre, 2016 ME 97,

which plaintiff was unable to prove its case at trial. Under these circumstances, a

dismissal without prejudice is not appropriate.

The entry is

Plaintiff Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as Trustee for Stanwich Mortgage Loan Trust A's Complaint against Kathleen M. Joyce is DISMISSE with Prejudice.

Date: August 1, 2016 ancy Mills ustice, Superio · Court