Wilmington Sav. Fund Socy., FSB v. Calhoun

2025 NY Slip Op 06356
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 2025·No. Index No. 711644/18·Published

Opinion

Wilmington Sav. Fund Socy., FSB v Calhoun (2025 NY Slip Op 06356)

Wilmington Sav. Fund Socy., FSB v Calhoun
2025 NY Slip Op 06356
Decided on November 19, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 19, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
LILLIAN WAN, JJ.

2019-10310
2020-06366
(Index No. 711644/18)

[*1]Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, etc., respondent,

v

Deborah A. Calhoun, etc., appellant, et al., defendants.


Petroff Amshen LLP, Brooklyn, NY (Serge F. Petroff, James Tierney, and Steven Amshen of counsel), for appellant.

Knuckles, Komosinski & Manfro, LLP, Elmsford, NY (Louis A. Levithan of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Deborah A. Calhoun appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Salvatore J. Modica, J.), entered August 15, 2019, and (2) an order of the same court entered September 18, 2019. The order entered August 15, 2019, insofar as appealed from, granted those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Deborah A. Calhoun, to strike that defendant's answer, and for an order of reference. The order entered September 18, 2019, insofar as appealed from, granted the same relief to the plaintiff and referred the matter to a referee to compute the amount due to the plaintiff.

ORDERED that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeals from the orders must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of an order and judgment of foreclosure and sale in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeals from the orders are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the order and judgment of foreclosure and sale (see CPLR 5501[a][1]; Wilmington Sav. Fund Socy., FSB v Calhoun, ___ AD3d ___ [Appellate Division Docket No. 2023-11000; decided herewith]).

IANNACCI, J.P., MILLER, CHRISTOPHER and WAN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilmington Sav. Fund Socy., FSB v. Calhoun, 2025 NY Slip Op 06356 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

2025 NY Slip Op 06356 (Wilmington Sav. Fund Socy., FSB v. Calhoun) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Aho
347 N.E.2d 647 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)