Wilmington Sash & Door Co. v. Taylor
82 A. 86, 25 Del. 528, 2 Boyce 528, 1911 Del. LEXIS 79
Opinion
The affiant did not swear that he is the treasurer of the plaintiff corporation. We adhere to and follow the decision made in the case of St. Joseph’s Soc. vs. St. Hedwig’s Church, 3 Penn. 229.
The affidavit of demand being defective and insufficient, judgment is refused this term.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilmington Sash & Door Co. v. Taylor, 82 A. 86, 25 Del. 528, 2 Boyce 528, 1911 Del. LEXIS 79 (Del. Ct. App. 1911).
82 A. 86 (Wilmington Sash & Door Co. v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Koury v. Claymont Development Co.
32 Del. 115 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1923)