Wilmington Canal & Reservoir Co. v. Dominguez

50 Cal. 505
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1875·No. No. 3989·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

By the Court:

By the second subdivision of section 1241 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it is provided in effect that before private property can be taken for a public use it must appear " that the taking is necessary for such use.”

That question was submitted to a jury, who found that at the time of the commencement of this action it was not necessary to take the land sought to be> taken by the plaintiff for the purposes stated in the complaint. The court disregarded the verdict, and found as a fact that it was necessary to take part of the land.

Section 1256 of the Code of Civil Procedure is as follows: “Except as otherwise provided in this title, the provisions of Part II of this Code are applicable to, and constitute the rules of practice in the proceedings mentioned in this title.” Section 592 of Part II provides that “an issue of fact must be tried by a jury, unless a jury trial is waived, or a reference ordered, as provided in this Code,”

There is no provision in the sections which relate to eminent domain inconsistent with the two sections just cited. Therefore, the judgment and order are reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilmington Canal & Reservoir Co. v. Dominguez, 50 Cal. 505 (Cal. 1875).

50 Cal. 505 (Wilmington Canal & Reservoir Co. v. Dominguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Herman
191 P. 934 (California Supreme Court, 1920)
Truckee River General Electric Co. v. Durham
149 P. 61 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1915)
San Joaquin & Kings River Canal & Irrigation Co. v. Stevenson
147 P. 254 (California Court of Appeal, 1915)
Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Fall Lake Boom Co.
148 N.W. 561 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1894)
Zigler v. Menges
22 N.E. 782 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1889)
Lorenz v. Jacob
63 Cal. 73 (California Supreme Court, 1883)
Cummings v. Peters
56 Cal. 593 (California Supreme Court, 1880)